In other words, a successful scientist is not the one who discovers new elements, but the one who prints more maculature.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Moreover, in the opinion of that subject, a successful scientist is one who prints more maculature in Western journals (in which, for political reasons, they sometimes refuse, ah)...

= = = = is = is = is = is = is = is = is = is
You are a bit out of the subject. The quotation index does not rise from macularity, it reflects how many people found your article useful and referred not to it in their work. That is, new and significant results need to be published constantly. Only publications are considered. Reviews of magazines.
In serious sciences for a long time for political reasons do not refuse to publish, these are complaints of those who are unable to write a suitable article.
The exchange of scientific results is one of the obligatory aspects of the scientific method.
Scientists from the "boxers" themselves do not publish, but they actively use other people's results. Only science they promote little compared to ordinary unsecretized scientists.
We’ve all seen a bit of movies about genius singles and secret laboratories, and they don’t exactly reflect reality.