Yes, and in general, it was before, the man is choking, and the wife is responsible for the household and comfort.
– – – – –
And you do not specify when it was so "formerly", where, and in what social layer? The nobility-domesticers did not "curl" in our understanding, their wives "responsible for their lives and comfort" by referring to all kinds of work of pig girls, i.e. They didn’t wash, they didn’t wash, they didn’t wash. Both men and women in the nobility class did not work too hard. In the peasants, the man smelled and the wood in the woods rubbed... and the wife at this time walked in the garden, walked for chickens, sheep, pigs, the cow doyled. Plus, she pulled water with cages, washed her hands, baked bread, looked after the children, wrapped, wrapped and wrapped the whole family. Somehow it’s a bit more than "being and comfort", isn’t it? The peasant worked much harder and harder than the current women, although she did not go to work. So who do you mean by describing “traditional division of labor” so uncompromisingly? Where "wrecked" only men, and wives walked dust butterflies smashed "for comfort"?