1992: No one sacralizes the victim. Simply by accusing the victim of provoking the criminal, society justifies the criminal. When they say “she is guilty” they mean that the criminal is not guilty. And if it is the fault, it is not very well understood. It is always in connection. Society sympathizes with the criminal, and therefore seeks out what the victim is wrong with. She may really be wrong – in that she doesn’t take into account the number of fools on the streets, but ADEQUATE people first and foremost have the idea of how a lot of fools on the streets are foolish, and that something needs to be done about it. We have to fight the rapists. And in our society, the first thought is to fight the manifestations of the stupidity of the victims in transparent shirts. Violents are perceived as an inevitable evil, like bad weather. When you get under the car, the driver can really be not guilty of anything, or guilty of negligence, in inattention. Not always the driver shoots the pedestrian intentionally (more precisely - almost never). Violence is always conscious. Always you understand? And this is really a terrible trouble, and you minimize the importance of this trouble, bring it down to the level of ice on the roads.