A quarrel begins on the subject - who is to blame if a pedestrian, suddenly appearing on the road, suddenly crashed the car.
Thus, wooden pedestrians who have no cars at all, and have no relatives, and friends and friends have no friends either. You also need to read the PDD. Section 4.5 tells us how a pedestrian should cross the road correctly. I will not copy it, it will take up a lot of space.
You must understand that even at a minimum speed the car cannot stop instantly, there is a braking path. That you can't run out because of the bus, against the sun and dark rainy weather you are very poorly seen. And there is more responsibility on you than on the driver, because it is much easier for you to see the car from a distance and react in time than for the driver at night at the opposite light of the headlights to see the figure jumped out on the road without reflective elements, and stop without a braking path. Almost always the court acknowledges the fault of the driver, regardless of where he struck the pedestrian - at the crossing or outside. A man recently struck a woman to death. There was an overpass, at 20 meters there was a lightforest, but a woman jumped out of the bus by an overpass. The speed was small, but it happened that the woman died. The relatives of the woman until the last attempted to plant a man, who is essentially not guilty at all, but could not, thank God. And in cases when drunk people suddenly roll out in the middle of the track, fall on the road from the sidelines - here even without talking, it is obvious whose fault.