Three Criticisms :
The Twice Criticism:

Try to look at the situation from the employer’s point of view. When everyone is fired and no one is hired for that money. What will schools do without teachers, factories without workers, clinics without doctors, bankers without office plankton? Wouldn’t it happen that employers are the first to call out and push vacancies up to heaven, so as not to suffer monstrous losses and create collapse?
...
And now the brain is turned on and throw, who is the employer of teachers, where the money is taken for the salary of employees of budgetary institutions, for what it will be necessary to replenish the budget in order to increase wages and multiply this by the irreversibility of the state budgetary mechanism and imagine how much time it will be expanded. And with factories and bankers, it is also funny - the wages of workers make up an impressive part of the cost of their products, so that if the employer, afraid of collapse, scourges to the heavens of wages, then you will die of the prices for this life before you find a job.
...
And now we open the distribution of the budget for 2017 and we see - 60% of the army, ments, deputies and even with them, 2.5% - the school... They have no weapons... The army and menta should be paid - the first to keep the weapons in the right direction, the second - to look at the whole country. Teachers don’t need guns and they don’t need guns.