I explained. Puffy legs are the same part of the image, as the swamps on the whole face. Which of the cosmetics knew only washing. That is, such a funny prostitute, who can be as smart as she wants, but this does not prevent her from being simple and straightforward.

But in the image of glamorous dolls they are, gently speaking, inappropriate.

It is just a matter of the combination of details in the image that someone chooses for themselves. It chooses forever, this week, this time of day, or this period of life. There is one "universally correct" rule - the details should be combined, and if contrasted, then by intent, not by stupidity. The attempt to declare these details as mandatory and universal rules itself is a testament to its own narrowness.

That is all.