I work in Morocco. Every day they are waiting for me for dinner and waiting for burning stories. If I burk “Nothing Interesting,” my wife will simply decide that I didn’t go to work, but was with my mistress all day. My mom was a lawyer and always had something to say. And colleagues and so everyone knows, we are not in the boxing sitting, one hall, everyone can see everything, and you will call yourself, if something really found interesting - for example, the bone between the hemispheres of the brain...And when a client with a 40 cm body got caught, everyone ran to watch, up to the registrars and students. As if you are not watching horror films or disaster films, all kinds of blockbusters-blood-intestines-spidorous, gentle, everything in life is much more prosaic. Only the smell is bad. In appearance nothing terrible.
Science about publications.
When I was a graduate student, then a meney (in the early 1980s), there was a saying:
What is different from co-authorship? Same as singing. and :)
It was so. In my first certificate there were 17 co-authors. The idea was conceived by three of us, then the vice-rector of science, the rest - the chief engineers of all the factories, where you could try to try it at least.
So it goes... (c) K. Vonnegut
On the subject of moles) my acquaintances had a haircut, and they always fall asleep for the winter. Two years ago, the hairdresser fell asleep, well, he was placed in a box and moved on an anthresol so that no one would disturb him. In the spring got a box, and there is a sleepy and LYSSY haircut, it is so mol swallowed))))))))
Specifications of the 4PDA:
Rhin0> I have tried. Instead of a flashing screen, I got a black screen. In principle, it is progress.
Of course, I would like more...
In other words, a successful scientist is not the one who discovers new elements, but the one who prints more maculature.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Moreover, in the opinion of that subject, a successful scientist is one who prints more maculature in Western journals (in which, for political reasons, they sometimes refuse, ah)...
= = = = is = is = is = is = is = is = is = is
You are a bit out of the subject. The quotation index does not rise from macularity, it reflects how many people found your article useful and referred not to it in their work. That is, new and significant results need to be published constantly. Only publications are considered. Reviews of magazines.
In serious sciences for a long time for political reasons do not refuse to publish, these are complaints of those who are unable to write a suitable article.
The exchange of scientific results is one of the obligatory aspects of the scientific method.
Scientists from the "boxers" themselves do not publish, but they actively use other people's results. Only science they promote little compared to ordinary unsecretized scientists.
We’ve all seen a bit of movies about genius singles and secret laboratories, and they don’t exactly reflect reality.
God could have given Adam an Ixbox, a Guinness tank, or a skateboard. I gave Grandma. Do you understand? They are needed for something. It remains to be understood why.