was not. As soon as a homosexual couple conceives and gives birth to their child (from two fathers or two mothers), then, and only then, it would be possible to talk about the generalization of the right to have children for all homosexual couples. and "self" childless There is no other basis for such a right.
And yes - rights are not taken from the ceiling according to the principle of "a mine of a pet"; rights derive from opportunities and are accompanied by duties, both personal and social.
Homosexuality fighters do not want to bear social duties, they only want rights. There is no balance, conflict is inevitable.
-----------
Something I didn’t understand... Probably rejection children testify that heterosexuals are terribly socially responsible? =^x.x^= And the fact that gay couples can not have their children, but can only give parental warmth to those who have been abandoned heterosexual - is it now those couples will go down? Go in your ass, hypocrites.