My aunt worked as a psychologist in a kindergarten. Following her words.

One day I called a teacher to the director. After the "call on the carpet" the teacher comes to me all pale and with turning tears. As it turned out, to the head came the parents of one of the children with the fact that their child complained about beating her teacher. They demanded an immediate dismissal of an incompetent employee. By the way, the teacher was a calm intelligent woman and this could not happen. The parents were invited to discuss the situation, where I was already present. They found out that when the parents took the child from the kindergarten, this conversation took place (R-parents, D-child):

Q: How did the day go, okay?

D is UGU.

R: Oh, what kind of blue on your hand, are you beaten? ! to

D is UGU.

Q: Who was the teacher?

D is UGU.

I offered to invite the child and talk to him, which the parents at first stunned, say, about which you can talk here in general, but then agreed. When the child was brought (hereinafter I - I, the child - D):

I am: Hi, the light. What is your beautiful dress and where did you get it from?

My mom bought it! : )

I: Oh, what a good mom you have... Well, turn in it... Oh, beauty... Oh, and where do you get the blue on your pen?

D: Yes, we were playing on the street, and Sascha ran to me, took it on his shoulders and let’s shake!



With all the words of my beloved chicken, wow! It turns out that the child after the kindergarten, was in his thoughts, and answered the parents unambiguously, without thinking about it. They are useful and misunderstandings can be avoided.