Review of the Supreme Court. Hollywood is resting.
In support of the claim, A. indicated that he was on treatment in the hospital.
The diagnosis of pneumonia. He gave blood for analysis and was released.
From the hospital, without completing the treatment and without explaining the reasons. Employee
Aids Center on the phone that according to the results of blood tests
Positive response to HIV infection. On the same day, the applicant
appeared at the AIDS Center, where he received clarifications regarding the
infected with HIV for more than a year, this fact puts life at risk
His close relatives have already notified his wife. after
Additional blood samples were taken to detect HIV.
infections, according to the results of which any form of HIV
No infection in the blood was detected. Message from AIDS staff
Centre to the wife of the plaintiff about his illness led to a sharp deterioration
the moral climate in the family and the termination of family relations. besides
Despite the results of the re-analysis, which confirmed the fact of an error in the diagnosis, the applicant came home in his absence.
AIDS Center staff who informed his father that the purpose of the visit was
control of the condition of the applicant who is infected with HIV. Conversations
This was done on the staircase, where witnesses
They became neighbors.