Fans of camouflage in the forest!
A couple of years ago in our city there was a case: a family went to the forest for mushrooms and lost a child 4(!) of years. He was dressed in camouflage pants, camouflage t-shirt, camouflage jacket and camouflage bandana (which impressed me). According to the parents, lost literally in a couple of minutes: mom and dad turned the mushrooms to cut, turned - the son is not visible and does not respond. Fortunately, we found it quickly in the morning. A few hundred meters from the place where the child was approximately lost, he slipped into a small hole and could not get out, was silent because he feared that his parents would argue (normal logic for a 5-year-old child). It all ended well, generally.
However, if the child was NOT camouflaged, would it be so easy to lose him by bending behind the mushrooms, and would it not be easier to notice in the wool before the call of the rescuers?
And – most importantly – well NAFIGA dress in the forest by mushrooms like Rambo in the jungle? Even a camouflage on the head, or suddenly a sniper on the mushrooms... And yet, why should this camouflage be released on a child’s size?
And no, I am not a mother, I have no children at all, I just don’t really understand why to create problems where you can’t create.