I had a client. Divorced from her husband, property has nothing to share, the only problem is that she took a consumer loan, with the funds of which a car was acquired. As long as they lived together - the loan continued to pay, and, remaining alone - does not pull.



I explained to her that in court, of course, you can file, but the husband is not a borrower, not a guarantor. He will say - I have not seen any credit in my eyes, I know nothing, and all, this is the end of the whole trial. We agreed that I will make a complaint, and already there, based on the answer, we will make a decision.



I send a complaint. The ex-husband personally answered. Such a winning look. And shouting - I'm not a fool there, I went to a big law firm, I was written a reply, fucking what the ex-wife will get!



I read. I did not understand. I read over. Again I did not understand. So and so, my wife took a loan for common purposes, etc. I fall into a light stupor. The answer was clearly not written by the man himself - he would not have written there literally. So what fucking thing is this law firm putting its client on the grandmother, acknowledging the fact of the loan?



And here it comes to me. If the answer meant - I don't know anything, I didn't see any loan, where my wife spent the money - I don't have the slightest idea, there would be no court, nothing. And so - the lawyers, where the man turned, created a client, ensuring a representation in the court. I put it on the grandmother.