My brother is married three times. Their first marriage broke up in a couple of years. After 17 years, his first wife calls him and demands that he consent to the child’s departure abroad. The fact that he (brother) has nothing to do with her son is not taken into account. Let's say, write, or I'll go to court, and try again to prove that it's not your son. My son was born a year after they separated.



UPD: The official divorce was, as it was.

He sent her culturally. A month later, a notification to the court in the mailbox. Everything was resolved as quickly as possible: DNA examination, with a mandatory requirement for reimbursement of court costs and the cost of the examination. The verdict was obvious: the son was not his, he was witnessed.

And I still don’t understand what’s going on in the heads of these women who are waging an absolutely losing war without a single chance of winning. Are you hoping for Avon?



UPD: It turns out, the brother consulted with a lawyer, and he advised not to sign anything, because this consent (mol, I am the father, and I agree that the child should leave) could serve as a hint to recognize him as his father, with a subsequent request for alimony for all those 17 years and other consequences.