We talked about some work moment with a colleague. And he gave me this tirade in defense of his point of view:

You are wrong! On one occasion to make conclusions stupid, it is necessary to make a large sample of cases...
Look, I came somehow with my daughter, but without my wife in Sochi for vacation. My wife was detained for a few days at work.
We are registered at the reception by a beautiful young receptionist. During the registration he asks:
“There are three, and where is your wife?”
I am her:
“And my girlfriend, with her lover Yakin, fled to the Caucasus today...”
I look, and her eyes are glazed, she hangs like, she looks at me and breathes so that another elderly receptionist standing next to her had to push her elbow, and like to feel:
“What a tension! He jokes, it's a Soviet film joke..." The young woman froze off like, only the eyes from now on she threw on us exclusively ice...
As a result, all the holidays I loaded, I said I was already so old, my memes are shit, no one to talk to, no one understands me, etc. and etc.
The next year I went back to Sochi, a different hotel.
As a result, his wife was arrested at work again. This time at the hotel reception we were welcomed by a guy, even younger than the receptionist from last year.
I wonder where my wife is. I made him a fool again:
And my mother-in-law, with her lover Yakin, fled to the Caucasus today.
He pulled his gaze from the compass, swallowing his palm on the table and cried:
“Take it off!!”
I am on the machine:
“Hey to God!”
He is already smiling:
“They are hunting?”
It turned me around, I rattled like an insane. broke along with him.
All the holidays were relaxed and fun.
So Petrovich, one case is not a case at all, but a coincidence.
For far-reaching conclusions, you need to consider as much sample as possible...