Today, Prep wrote a review about me before defending my diploma:

After consultation with the head of the graduate project student Drugal I.N. He appealed twice.
On the technological part of the project, I made a number of remarks, but most of the remarks of the diploma were challenged, and the impression was created that they were not interested in him.
At the second consultation held on 26 May, Drugal I.N. He brought a title sheet, a technological part and a special head with a request to put a signature on the title sheet and urgently give him the name of a specialist who will give a feedback on the diploma project, because he has little time to defend.
I had nothing left but to agree with the diplomat – suddenly in front of me a young follower of the brilliant Perelman, and the head of the diploma project is the first to underestimate him.
In the current situation to give an objective assessment of the quality of the Diploma Project Drugal I.N. It is not possible, however, to deprive a diplomat of the right to defend his work at the GAC meeting I consider it inappropriate.

It was "Good"!