Insurance does not live from the individual customer but from the turnover. Thus e. Investment of attracted funds. Investment income allows you to pay customers, conduct business and the owner to ride on the cayenne and to snack the altar with omars. And non-payment for 1 insurance case - if there are grounds for it - for even not the biggest SK - a drop in the sea.
Congratulations to the Actualist.


And this is why insurance payments for OSAGO, for example, amounted to 55.7% of the funds they collected in 2012.Moreover, a significant proportion of these payments are the result of the work of not insurance companies, but courts, which, because of the fact that insurance companies do not bother themselves to seek legitimate reasons for non-payments, take the side of customers in the overwhelming number of cases.