[ +
43
- ]
[1 ]
25.09.2012
Question from the Survivor Forum:
Why the topic of close-knit mixing is important for survivors is obvious.
Remember how we were taught in school - close-kind mixing leads badly to degeneration and it cannot be allowed. And generally speaking, the overwhelming majority of people have no other opinion. Well, that the topic of taboo was also fooled so long thought to create or not, but I will still try.
My logic is nothing more.
What happens in a close relationship:
1) the option - a child is born sick in our society it is a big trouble for parents and a serious burden for society but in the post-BP world such a child is most likely to die from natural causes very quickly well and the norms of marali will most likely be somewhat different and probably will not allow him to live well within the framework of morality.
2) the option - the dangerous-harmful genes will be passed on to the offspring but will not act and will remain asleep just as it is now happening to unrelated individuals
3) the option - the harmful gene is derived from the genes of the individual and will actually have a positive effect on the genetic health of the population.
What do you think about this?
The first answer
Go straight to the essence. Who did you fuck?