The love of English words for illiterate people is a fairy tale.
Today one employee brought lunch to work according to his words in "LAUNCH-BOXE" >.<. He did not know where the red button was.

One girl, when she was learning the right French kiss, was given a chocolate every time.
It has been five years, but every time she is given chocolate, the girl is wildly embarrassed and turns red.
--------
Are you confused with French?

I found nine bugs.
To please him
A tune of ten dollars.
Revo

In the young month of April, snow falls in the old park.

Bees in citations about religion, bees in citations about dances.
Fuck the bees.

xx: Something after these steam fish-vegetables you want to eat, as if you did not eat
Xy: They’re all demons inside of you, don’t listen to them.)
But the demons are hungry! As a good hostess, I have to feed my guests.

Equal assistance is promised to currency and ruble mortgages.

The same will be applied to X.

And yet, Andrew is amazing. He can support people in difficult times.
YYYYYYYYYYYYY I think if he goes into the office, and there is a man in a chair and with his head in the loop, he will say something like “Well, you are... Don’t stretch.”

About the bees:

The whole essence of democracy is the freedom to do what you want, as long as you do not disturb others. You specifically don't like this dance - don't watch, and don't give your children to such dances. Other people like – let them and their children dance, it’s their right. This is not forbidden anywhere in the law. I am personally outraged by the fact that the state decides for parents which dances to dance to their children. And the fact that I’t give my daughter to such dances doesn’t mean that it’s forbidden to everybody.

by 17054
Do not wear a coat, you will become Neo
____________________
You are an eleven-year-old hysterical, regardless of your biopole and biological age, and not a black coat. Looking at Kosovo? Look at who you want, likewise. Joking and bullying? Joke and respond. And with thumbs on the superior forces for the fact that "not so looked at" or rjut - it sooner or later you are so accustomed that not to black coats and white coat will become.

Mmm... never ever? Even if she is 30 years old? Will she obey?
And the fact that your daughter can walk on the street (being thirty years old, we will not aggravate), men can look at her and imagine how, in what poses and for how long - it doesn't bother you?
----------
I will say more.
It is possible that the daughter will walk on the street, look at the men and think how they will be her in different poses... or she will be theirs... or other women...
The horror...
Not going out on the street)

Prices delight the eye that when I see such prices, I cry. And running tears moisten the eyes well, preventing dryness and painful fatigue.

In the sick sins of pedophiles... that is, forgiveness, advocates of morality - there already, at least, contained an underground pritoon, where small cute schoolgirls were held in silk, kidnapped from families and taking out passports, and forced to dance before the same pedophiles - e-e, that is, advocates. Interested people used to look for the root cause of the shout and-and-woal! We found a dance of girls who were small and cute, at best, five years ago, performing in front of their own parents, who came there quite voluntarily and did not jump onto the stage in the urge to take a little blood out of this "unrighteousness", but boil from indignation some generally left-wing uncles and aunts. "Why is cheese-bor?" asked normal people - and - about strange! Pedophiles-rejoicing began to call "pedophiles" those whose heads are all right and who do not see in the flower drawn by children allegory I.
The invincible logic of a bright cosmic-religious future, what!

And yes, if a fifteen-year-old looks and paints like a thirty-year-old, then she, of course, still cannot be fucked, but to look at her as a woman is no pedophilia.

When I see the phrase "I thought a lot" at the end of the quote, I immediately want to shout out: "Finally!"

Stop the nonsense. Can you give an example when a more complex organism has supplanted a less complex one? And I can do the opposite – dinosaurs died in the fall of a meteorite, and bacteria and the simplest survived. From an evolutionary point of view, this is nonsense. So much time of evolution and selection, increased the chances, suppressed the suppressed - and all died together from some meteorite! The eruption of a volcano or something else. Why do we need a mechanism that doesn’t work?
____________________________________________
To be honest, I can hardly imagine how it is possible not to understand the most obvious things. You are like those Americans who write on the microwave: “Don’t cuddle pets.” Likewise, the cat, and from some microwave died... It is all the producer's fault, the villain, did not take into account such a possibility.
Evolution is the same producer. The dinosaurs were well designed and lived well in the existing conditions. Meteorites are not predicted. Not even the meteorites themselves, but the subsequent sharp climate change. As a result, the conditions were created that the creatures suddenly found themselves placed in a medium not intended for them. Why they died. If the atmosphere suddenly ceases to contain oxygen, we will also die. All of. But after some time (a billion years) there will be some water- or new-atmosphere-breathing intelligents who have evolved from the simplest. Well, if there is no cataclysm with them either.

More often than others, he who sits in the ass of the world considers himself the pope of the earth.

From the chemist’s story:
...and there was a bolt, and on it such...Din. Metal stuff similar to benzene. The Gail!

I stand in line for the products in the kiosk
xxxh: in front of me a man (M), then a dialogue with the seller (P):
Give half of the black bread.
Q: You know it was yesterday.
Q: How long was it yesterday?? to
A: Well the yesterday.
Very strong yesterday?? to
(P): Well look at it... (and give it in your hands)
(m): (mnet ) so it’s not very yesterday – I take))

Not for some, but for all. Speak honestly.
When the old Darwin wrote his theory, he said that future finds would confirm it, he wrote that thousands of transitional species with embryos of certain organs would be found. However, millions of discoveries have been made since then — and nothing like that, although evolution has allegedly evolved over millions of years. Nothing happened - those species that were supposedly transitional turned out to be quite independent. There are hundreds of species of fish with swamps that swim and swim with bird swamps. Underdeveloped or in the process of developing organs / limbs. There are only a couple of three species - which blow off for all so-called transitional species. However, scientists very much want it to be so, so they try not to pay attention to critical things, and any microscopic discovery, which at least slightly flies to the mill of evolution, is immediately caught.
– – – – –
Tictalic - scabies and scales + lungs and movable neck. Ichtiostega and Akantostega are the same song, but with more developed floaters.
Archaeopteryx is a pear dinosaur with a tooth.
Mesogipus is a prehistoric horse, with fingers instead of copits.
Ambulocetus is a whale that still has legs.
The dark forms of humans.
And such species are open enough to be convinced of the fidelity of the evolutionary approach. And you, a creationist citizen, know a lot of findings supporting your creation theory?

Today you dance hard, and tomorrow you reject the homeland!