It is worse. For example, Pushkin did not mention the age of Tatiana in the text itself, only mentioned somewhere in the correspondence that he was sixteen. However, he carelessly turned into thoughtfulness the turn about the Peter's charms, in the context of which the abstract "thirteen-year-old girl" was mentioned. It, in principle, with thirteen or fourteen daughters and began to be taken for all kinds of techniques, with Pushkin it is all logical. But some of the internet lovers on this subject felt like under the thirteenth-year-old girl meant Tatiana - the ways of the glutes are untold, and attempts to pretend logically that if the older sister is thirteen, then the younger could not wash up already married, were ignored. On this topic, the glucologists raced a bunch of insightful reasoning to Pushkin that Onegin de rejected Tatiana, because she was thirteen years old, and he was not a pedophile, and then met the teenager and, accordingly, penetrated. To pretend, why then this nepedophile showed bullying signs of attention to Olga, who, it turns out, was a child in the most literal sense (and not in the sense of infantilism of Pushkin's "spirituality") - again irrelevant.
After such confusing the age of Raskolnikov's mother with the age of the old lady-percent - it's still flowers)))