xxx: I was struck by only one thing in your comment: that you described a nice, smart and interesting boy as “the perfect victim for seduction.” It did not seem to be a proper installation.

yyy: "good, smart, interesting" and "ideal sacrifice for harassment". In my opinion, for those who passed Russian literature, there is no contradiction. Chatty for example. From the point of view of the Famosov society behaved somehow wrong, was not dialogue, was not part of the collective.

Chatsky behaved frankly humbly, inadequately, and generally rattled, not because he was better or smarter, but because he rattled.

YYY: Oh, eternally alive Russian literature... there will always be a reason for discussion.