The problem of modern clashes is, at best, the unjustified extrapolation of experience.
Thus e. A person has an experience, which means “so is also” and automatically replaces its value with “so is only”.
Often the same experience, which is so categorically shared with us by the participant of the clash, is extremely subjective. We receive not an objective description of the experience, but its observation by one of the participants.
“I’m not afraid of mice, so men are not afraid of mice.” Here "meaning men are not afraid of mice" is an unjustified extrapolation. A "I am not afraid of" subjective perception. What people thought in the process was behind the picture. Even if they said, “No-no, dear, of course you weren’t scared. And on the table just because the mouse is better visible from there" - the storyteller does not have objective data :)
And in neglected cases, we observe the extrapolation of non-existent experience. Man does not know how he has obtained an opinion, and shares it with others. Do not ask forcibly. Per this could be called "Missionary Syndrome"