Therefore, if someone thinks that a cartoon involving Christ or God the Father is blasphemy, but God does not impress the author, then a person whose “religious feelings” are “insulted” must think about the following:

1st Appealing to the court instances with the demand to punish the “prisoner” may indicate a lack of belief of the plaintiff in the fact that God himself can cope in this case, because they insult God.
2nd The claim submitted diminishes the dignity of God Himself, for God is Almighty and the attempts of believers to advocate for Him indicate to outsiders that God is incapable or extremely weak.
Three God may like jokes about Himself and His Son, because a perfect Personality implies a perfect sense of humor. Judicial lawsuits expose God as an evil tyrant with a vulnerable self-love.
4 is God in ancient times could independently express his opinion on various issues, so rather than deciding for God (whether He was insulted or not), believers should be allowed to personally give God an explanation of the situation. For example, through a voice from heaven with many witnesses, who profess different world views. If God does not respond for a long time, then God has no claims to the defendants.
5 is God may not exist, and therefore it is impossible to hasten Him.