Excellent story about Donetsk
1st The level of education of the author of the text is in the range of students 3-5 grade of general education school. Lack of knowledge of life realities, primitive associative chains such as "covering road + homeophone = rich house", "expensive cigarettes - Parliament and Malborough", "expensive clothes - Gucci and Coco Chanel", "expensive car - Volvo and Mercedes". The constant mention of brands of manufacturers is clearly not of a promotional nature. Prospective expressions such as "in the old age" etc., numerous repetitions of words without replacement by synonyms. All this indicates a low social level of the author and a very small vocabulary.
2nd The text uses two sets of stable stamps and twists, indicating that the text has two authors of approximately the same level.
Three The level of knowledge of the Russian language is extremely low, the vocabulary is small. However, the features of the construction of proposals do not allow to determine the native languages of the authors. It would be more accurate to say that among the earthly languages there is no one that is native to the author.
The combination of these findings served as the basis for the guess that texts of non-human origin are published under the pseudonym "Daria Dontsov". The repeated study gave the following results:
1st Creatures look at the world from a height of 10 to 15 centimeters, from which any heels are "high", all rooms are "enormous", houses and fences are "healthy" and so on.
2nd Animals do not belong to cats. They don’t know how to catch small rodents. Probably these are dogs. Specific "proverbs" such as "Who's meat, who's bones" and the like, excellent knowledge of favorite dog entertainment and tastes, good knowledge of inexpensive dog food.
Three If it were possible to make such an unrealistic assumption, we would argue that the texts submitted for the study were written by a couple of elderly mops who came out of the period of reproductive activity. As Professor P. Leighhausen, a member of the research group, noted: “If I were offered to describe people’s lives from the point of view of a mops, using the knowledge of a mops and suggesting the possible vocabulary of a mops living in a poor family, it would be very similar!”