The school psychologist every year conducted various surveys, anonymous, of course, about everything in the world, including how comfortable we feel at school, how we treat teachers, etc. So, the first year, it was in class seven, we, the naive, wrote everything honestly. A psychologist, by the way, a normal aunt, would not show us anything for this, she always communicated with us normally, adequately, often gave some advice. But the problem was that the leaflets were collected by our Russian teacher (they wrote a survey at her lesson). Of course, she then read them all, calculated us by handwriting and arranged a speech: "Oh, your food in the school dining room is unpleasant, your mother feeds you with cakes every day. As it is Irina Grigorieva, she is a well-deserved teacher, here she will catch her heart when she learns." Nothing criminal, but it was very unpleasant.

A year later, we were again given a survey and tests, we already as learned people did not start to write anything bad, but one guy from our class, as we learned later, decided to say everything honestly and wrote everything he thinks, but in printed letters. The same story repeated, the Russian collected the sheets and still calculated who wrote it, simply by the exception method. I began to argue with him and demand that he rewrite. Our class decided to support him and rewrite everything. What do you think happened afterwards? When our dear Russian teacher gathered our leaflets, she found that already 10 pieces were written in printed letters and with frank statements addressed to the school. She quietly stood up and went to bring the leaflets to the psychologist. In the following years, the surveys were conducted by the psychologist himself for some reason.