If I, an atheist, are handed to read some "Life of Serafim Sarovsky" with a commentary, say, there are arguments that God still has answers to all your questions... I will only look at the donor as a nearby: the question of whether there is a god or not, for me has long been closed, I am not going to waste my time reading another religious nonsense.
You might think that anyone who laughs at a girl from history would have done differently.
So why not imagine that she feels the same about scientific literature?

Biblical Abraham came to the idea of monotheism, beginning to worship in turn the lamps and elements.
If I have a firm life position, then there was a path that led to it. The process of reflection. So I can argue against any opposite idea. At first, this process was going on within me.
For this, it is necessary to at least understand the subject as well as the main counterarguments.
To read everything in a row and argue with every troll nobody will. But a dispute with a worthy interlocutor and reading generally accepted literature should not spoil the mood, on the contrary.