The writer:

It turns out, they have fun together, and pay, mostly, alone. Or you really think: he didn’t quite give up and is already good, and she doesn’t feel much gratitude – horror how bad?

That the girl endured more than him, no one doubts. Admits-does not acknowledge, says "not my" and falls down at sunset, this is all clear. But do you think he should have married a girl without feeling any sympathy for her, except for the irritation that he was pushed into the shell? This marriage would be very strong. What an example of a happy family for a child. That the girl could fall in love with him - could, and could not, and would be another family, where the parents live together for the sake of the child and dogging without stopping. How much harm such a family arrangement can cause the psychic of the child, let family psychologists say. And you answer the full version of the story, i.e. the key points about the fact that he was engaged in a child not less than his mother (taken to himself for several months, etc., paid alimony and de facto contained the girl), you threw it out.
— — — —

Are you rich in imagination or can’t read? He did not keep the girl, he paid alimony for the child. And there was no word about the fact that he was dealing with the child no less than his mother and especially took him with him for several months. Don’t get married, just learn to use condoms and don’t reproduce like weeds.