Comments on the article "I built a helicopter"
I also built from gips.
And I built from concrete.
Special (Prof built over 100 flying helicopters used in combat conditions): It is good that you are interested in this topic, but advice1, advice2, advice3.
Author of the article: advice1 - ok, advice2 - ok, advice3 - not understood
SPECIAL: advice3, here so and here so, therefore and therefore
The author (Nihren did not understand from the explanation, but is afraid to admit): and why?
What is more effective here and then
author (I never understood, but can’t say): I have a hobby, scream on efficiency, the helicopter’s blades turn
Special: they are turning, but he will not fly, because Todd and Todd
Author: Yes and Pooh
Uzer2: I built out of concrete, and advice3 fucking, because (argument with complicated terms that Uzer2 does not understand, but took from the previous answer of the special)
Special: not quite so, advice3 - good, because and because (repeats the arguments in a simplified form, because I realized that the interlocutors are not aware of the basics and do not understand it)
user2: advice3 - shit, because (arguments about the moon in the third house of the body and the construction of a concrete cluster)
We are talking about helicopters and what does the horoscope have to do with it? Judging from your comments, you do not understand what you are talking about.
You blur so that I don’t understand, which means you don’t know.

The author, without understanding the basic basics, is going to build an even more complex non-flying helicopter. Spets in minus, in auhu, and no more comments.