Our school is full of practitioners. There has never been such an invasion. This is due to the fact that in the cities where they are taught, mainly distance learning, and we have all the classes are taught on a regular basis. The practitioners are fun people. One of all the students calls on you that it is not accepted at all in the village. The students are embarrassed and silent. Today, on a big shift, he, reddened, told (he is a computer scientist) that several nine-grade students in the class were watching freelance pictures, and asked advice on how to punish them. After that, the chemistry teacher told her an adulterous story:

The case was in the mid-1980s. One of the boys attracted to the school magazine Playboy. All day he walked on the hands of his classmates, because they saw it for the first time. In physics class, the teacher took out the magazine. He considered it for a long time, and then took it to the director of the school. The scandal broke out terrible. The real question arose about the exclusion of a supporter of sexual education from school. Meeting of Parents. One momma, by the way, a methodist of ROA, emphasized: “Exclude is necessary. I hope my Lenocha didn’t look at that shit.” It seemed that the exile of the student could not be avoided. Here stands up the candidate for the gold medal, Anka Ovcharov, and says: "Then exclude the whole class. They were watching.” And turning to the daughter of the Methodist, she said, "I saw you on geography to confess him." The director wondered, “Are you ready to stay without a medal?” And she said, “Are you ready to stay without a graduate class?” Eventually, it all ended with a strict excuse.

After hearing this story, the practitioners thought. Then the future English woman asked, “What, could you have been expelled from school before?” And the future computer scientist said, “I don’t understand a little, but what is Playboy?”

The question drowned in a general hustle. No, not the practitioners today, not the ones!