Pre-trial procedure for dispute resolution

During his trip to the region, he encountered a very curious case.
It turned out that nowhere in our Russian laws is written that documents should be drawn up on paper, and not on any other materials. The whole city laughed at a businessman’s conflict with the bank. What they did not share, I personally did not listen. We talked about some unfair commission payments, about some payment for servicing the account... But these matters are subtle and legal. You know reliably what is.

When the entrepreneur (hereinafter - P) appealed to the bank for the resolution of the conflict, the bank employees said: "Write the claim, we will consider it for 60 days and then we will still refuse." P departed from the office, saying goodbye: "They asked for themselves." Banks did not take into account that P is a monopoly in the supply of stone for monuments, foundations and other things. Here P and made the requested claim to the bank. A quiet Sunday evening, a heavy truck carried the complaint through the city. Near the closed office of the bank, the claim was carefully loaded out by two heavy cranes and installed on the wing. And in the morning it turned out that the claim a little hindered the employees of the bank to get to the office. In fact, the claim was very modest. Strict plate of gray granite, weighing some 12 tons. A claim to the bank was thrown out on the plate in all form.
With all the details, including the P address for the answer.

Of course, the bank did not leave it that way. The unemployed employees of the bank called the police. After carefully studying the claim, the police explained that there is no crime, but there are civil-legal relations. After that, they advised the bank to resolve the matter with P in the court of general jurisdiction and departed on their own. The claim remains. The bank tried to remove the claim on its own. Unfortunately, P was the only happy owner of the multi-axis trailer and the corresponding equipment. Without the trailer, the claim was not possible. The bankers called the tractor and gathered to grab the claim with a wire and crash at least from the door to the street. The pretentious work was stopped by the passing police officers, who explained that it is impossible to overwhelm the passing part with claims. Poor bank workers had to enter the workplace through the windows. Customers of the bank polently refused and preferred to go to other banks.

The next day, the judge of the district court, having heard the complaint of the bank, refused to demand from P to cancel the claim. Moreover, it turned out that the bank does not have the right to reject the claim on the grounds of the use of non-paper materials, but must move it to the archive and consider it in accordance with its own order. As a result, on the third day, the brigade of workers with clutches hired by the bank still crushed the claim to the size to be carried. And the same day, P called the bank and polently asked about the results of consideration of the claim. After hearing the promise of P in the case of wires to put out a new claim, already on three pages, the bank chose not to bring up to this and urgently canceled for P all commissions. So pre-trial settlement is a very effective measure!