My aunt is a judge. She recently had an interesting affair in her hands. A man sued the driver who struck his cat. The cat, according to the owner, was a very expensive breed and for this he demanded a significant monetary compensation for it. In his favor, the plaintiff presented the evidence of the cat’s innocence (!The cat of this breed was very intelligent, knew the rules of traffic and crossed the street in the specified places. So I couldn’t intentionally get under the car.” But this is something else. At the hearing, the judge said, “Do you not think that the cat, being so clever, committed suicide?”