Yesterday I learned that my first-class son also knows the mother-in-law words and can put them in the right place, so that I blame not because he knows them, but because of his own stupidity:
We understand with him what is the object (substantial), action (global) and sign (applicable). The proposal "The bird sits on a thin branch" needs to be disassembled by words. He’s answered right, but "why" – we’ve been fighting for half an hour.
I: Sasha, is the first word "bird" an object, a sign or an action?
C is object.
I : Why?
A: It is just an object. Not an action, not a sign.
I: What question does the "bird" answer? In the hope of hearing from the son "Who? What is"
S is?? to
I: Well get together. What is the answer to "The Bird"?
A: A and A?? to
I : well?
C ("indignated"): I am!!! BLAT!!! I don’t know who the bird is?